|
|
| |
| |
| |
See also:
|
About Us > Hot Topics > Scholarly Communication Issues
Why Managing Copyright Matters Managing copyright wisely can significantly enhance the values of the educational system. Decisions about copyright can:
The fundamental business of education is to create and share knowledge. The existing marketplace for intellectual property often accomplishes this through the strong and productive balancing of creators' and users' rights that copyright law is designed to achieve. However, the effective sharing of knowledge is sometimes jeopardized in the case of specialized scholarly monographs and journal articles, where reading audiences are relatively small and publishing outlets limited in number. Especially with regard to journal articles, authors commonly give away their ownership rights in exchange for prestigious publication. As a result, publishers are at liberty to control the use of the author's work, sometimes imposing significant costs and administrative burdens on using the work for non-commercial education purposes. Rarely does the author have any voice in deciding how the work will be used. Authors
should read and understand the agreements they sign with
publishers. Copyright law gives the creator of copyrighted work exclusive rights, including principally:
Copyright creators may transfer some or all of these rights to a publisher. The copyright creator may also retain ownership but grant licenses to other parties to exercise one or more of these rights. Copyright licenses may be exclusive or non-exclusive; for a specified period of time or for the full term of the copyright; for one medium or many; or defined or restricted in various other ways. Faculty
and other academic authors have three options, broadly speaking,
for managing their copyrights:
Option 1 Use of this option, though common, is ill advised because it allows the publisher to prohibit or heavily burden many republication and educational uses of copyrighted works, without even consulting the author. Option 2 The difficulty in using the second option lies in the author's need to anticipate everything he or she may wish to do with the work, especially over time as information technology transforms both publishing and instruction. Option 3 Faculty and other academic authors maximize their freedom to use their own work, and that of like-minded colleagues, when they decline to transfer copyrights to their scholarly work to publishers, but routinely grant publishers exclusive licenses for the first formal publication of their work (in print, digital, or some other form) and non-exclusive rights for at least the following purposes:
In addition, faculty and other academic authors who retain their copyrights may wish to grant a limited set of rights that any reader can exercise without explicit permission. These rights might involve the use of the author's work for non-profit educational purposes. There are four essential features of Option 3.
Creative Commons is a non-profit corporation founded to assist authors in granting limited rights to readers. Its website provides additional guidance. As an author, it is up to you to understand the nature of the market in which you are publishing and to determine the option that maximizes your individual interests as well as those of the broader academic community. If you decide you would like to retain your copyright and license specific uses to the publisher, you may want to develop your own publishing agreement and substitute that for the publisher's contract. Some publishers have accepted such agreements without objection. Click here to look at a sample Publication Agreement. Alternatively, you may wish to amend the publisher's version of the copyright transfer agreement. Sometimes changing a few words (exclusive to non-exclusive, for example) or substituting language for a particular section may be all that is needed. In many instances, publishers will accept the changes. Click here to look at a sample Publisher's Contract. If the publisher does not accept your change, take the opportunity to talk with them. What rights must they hold to conduct their business? How specifically would the rights that you have asked to retain interfere with their business? How might you work together to address these concerns? Perhaps a few further modifications will be all that is needed. Finally, if the publisher remains adamant, review your options. Do you need to be published in this particular publication? Is there a viable alternative? If so, withdraw the work and let the publisher know why. If not, try to retain some rights, such as the right to use your own work in your research and teaching, to republish the work in a collection of your own works, and to post your work on the web. Many scholarly publishers are already granting such rights. Managing your copyright wisely can go a long way toward ensuring access to your work for the academic community. It can also contribute to positive change in the scholarly communication system. Most of the information in this document is derived from material in the Create Change website, sponsored by the Association of Research Libraries, the Association of College and Research Libraries, and the Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition. The information is intended only as guidance, not as a substitute for competent legal counsel. Please consult an attorney if you have questions regarding a specific contract.
webmaster@libraries.mit.edu This page was last updated on Thursday, 16-Jul-2009 07:54:40 EDT |
|