|
|
|
|
MIT Libraries
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table 9. Current Staff Profile - Filled Positions in Libraries |
|||||||||||||||||
Staff Category |
Total |
Male |
Female |
White |
Black |
Asian |
Hispanic |
Native |
Total |
||||||||
|
|
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
Admin. |
99 |
36 |
36% |
63 |
63% |
90 |
90% |
3 |
3% |
3 |
3% |
2 |
2% |
1 |
1% |
9 |
9% |
Support |
98 |
41 |
41% |
57 |
57% |
84 |
84% |
3 |
3% |
5 |
5% |
5 |
5% |
1 |
1% |
14 |
14% |
Total |
197 |
77 |
39% |
120 |
61% |
174 |
88% |
6 |
3% |
8 |
4% |
7 |
4% |
2 |
1% |
23 |
12% |
Table 10. Current Staff Profile - Filled Positions in AMPS |
|||||||||||||||||
Staff Category |
Total |
Male |
Female |
White |
Black |
Asian |
Hispanic |
Native |
Total |
||||||||
|
|
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
# |
% |
Admin. |
13 |
11 |
36% |
2 |
63% |
13 |
90% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
Support |
5 |
3 |
41% |
2 |
57% |
4 |
84% |
0 |
0% |
1 |
5% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
1 |
20% |
Total |
18 |
14 |
39% |
4 |
61% |
17 |
88% |
0 |
0% |
1 |
4% |
0 |
0% |
0 |
0% |
1 |
5% |
In FY08 approximately 17% of the 250-plus applicants for Administrative Staff positions were identified as possible underrepresented minorities. This is a slight increase over last year and a significant percentage when compared to earlier years. Unfortunately, about three quarters of these URM applicants did not meet the basic education or experience qualifications of the positions for which they applied. In many cases, hiring managers contacted the applicants by telephone to confirm their qualifications. Five URM applicants were invited to campus for interviews, resulting in one hire. Another URM applicant was also hired into a term position associated with the DSpace Foundation.
Of the 21 Support Staff hired in FY08, four (nearly 19%) are underrepresented minorities. Equally significant is the fact that three of these new hires are either enrolled in library school or have expressed an interest in attending. One, in fact, has a degree in Physics - an exciting prospect for feeding the sci-tech librarian pipeline.
The MIT Libraries have renewed and strengthened their commitment to recruiting and developing a diverse workforce as demonstrated by our participation in a number of initiatives of direct benefit to MIT as well as to the library profession as a whole. At the annual meeting of the American Library Association (ALA) in June 2008, one MIT librarian “graduated” from the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) Leadership and Career Development Program (LCDP). This 18-month program prepares mid-career librarians from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups to take on increasingly demanding leadership roles in ARL libraries. Funding for this librarian’s participation (approximately $10K) was provided by the MIT Libraries to cover tuition, travel, meeting registrations, etc. As this particular librarian’s participation in the program drew to a close, the MIT Libraries strongly endorsed and supported the nomination of another MIT librarian for the program. We recognize this as a unique and exciting opportunity for librarians to develop leadership skills as well as for the MIT Libraries to support academic research libraries in developing a more diverse professional workforce.
To help raise our profile as an active supporter of diversity initiatives in the profession, the Libraries joined with other institutions in two sponsorships in FY08. This year marked the tenth anniversary of the American Library Association’s Spectrum Scholar Program, which has supported over 400 library school students with scholarships since 1997. A current librarian at MIT is a past participant of this program, and through an advertisement in the tenth anniversary commemorative booklet, the Libraries congratulated her and demonstrated MIT’s support of this valuable program. The MIT Libraries are also a sponsor of the National Diversity in Libraries Conference to be held in the Fall of 2008 at the University of Kentucky.
The Libraries are particularly pleased about a new diversity initiative scheduled for October 2008 with the Harvard College Library. Planning began in the spring for this two-day event for library school students and recent library school graduates who are participants in the ARL and/or ALA diversity programs. As many as thirty participants will spend one day at Harvard and one day at MIT to learn about the numerous initiatives, challenges and opportunities that exist for librarians working in dynamic research and teaching communities; to discuss current trends in the field; to spend time with librarians who share similar interests and backgrounds; and to observe and participate in some of the daily activities of our organizations. Expenses for attendees (travel, lodging and meals) will be fully covered by MIT and Harvard.
Through involvement in these programs and a more diligent approach to learning about and meeting applicants who may be underrepresented minorities, we hope to expand our knowledge about the available pool of diverse candidates in the profession and ultimately be more successful in recruiting them. The Libraries’ Diversity Council, formed in the summer of 2007, will also explore how we might shape and re-focus some of our staff programs to encourage and support greater diversity, including an initiative focused on current Support Staff employees who are interested in librarianship. The Libraries have also established relationships with other Institute staff focused on diversity - Genesia Eddins in central Human Relations and Robbin Chapman in the School of Architecture and Planning. We are encouraged by the creative ideas and the support these two individuals have offered as we develop programs and initiatives for supporting diversity in the Libraries.
The Libraries’ retention rate in FY08 was roughly 90%, which is about 5% higher than in FY07. A total of 26 staff members departed the Libraries: 17 Support Staff, eight Administrative Staff, and one member of the Sponsored Research Staff.
While the number of Support Staff departures may seem high - at 17% of the total library Support Staff - it is not alarming when considered in context. One quarter of these staff members entered the librarian profession after many years of pre-professional experience in the Libraries and earning an MIT- supported MLS (through the tuition assistance program); another 25% left to further their education. The other departures can be attributed to relocation, parenting, and retirement.
Only eight Administrative Staff members left the Libraries - about 8% of the total Administrative Staff. Of those, two were retirements; one took a higher-level position within the Institute; one left a supervisory position to assume her first librarian position; and another relocated for family reasons. In one case, a librarian whom we recruited from the Northwest just two years ago returned there due to the high cost of living in the Boston area.
Four staff members retired from the MIT Libraries in FY08, the highest number in many years. Eileen Dorschner, the Aeronautics and Astronautics Librarian, retired after 28 years of service to the profession. Linda Cuccurullo, the Monograph Cataloger in Cataloging and Metadata Services, retired after 38 years at the MIT Libraries. P.J. Buehler worked as a Copy Cataloger for almost 20 years in Cataloging and Metadata Services; and Jim Paton served in a variety of technical positions in Document Services for nearly 40 years. Congratulations to them all!
Two Sponsored Research Staff members completed their appointments in FY08. With the end of the SIMILE project, Project Manager Ben Hyde left the Institute in May. Richard Rodgers, who also worked on the SIMILE project, moved to a regular Administrative Staff position as the Head of Software Development in the Digital Research and Development Group.
While the latest data from the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) annual salary survey cited below shows a somewhat disappointing picture of MIT’s average professional librarian salary in comparison to the ARL peer group of 113, we are optimistic about gaining ground in the future. We anticipate that the impact of recent allocations of additional salary funds to address equity and market issues will be reflected in the survey data next year and perhaps more significantly the following year.
Table 11. Association of Research Libraries Annual Salary Survey Ranking of MIT Average Professional Librarian Salaries |
||||||
|
2002-2003 |
2003-2004 |
2004-2005 |
2005-2006 |
2006-2007 |
2007-2008 |
Average professional |
16 |
13 |
21 |
21 |
24 |
25 |
Among 21 selected peer institutions in this ARL group, MIT held its place at the mid-point in average professional salary. The gap between Harvard and MIT remains the same.
Table 12. Association of Research Libraries Annual Salary Survey Ranking of MIT and Harvard Professional Librarian Salaries Among Selected Peer Institutions* |
|||||||
|
FY2002 |
FY2003 |
FY2004 |
FY2005 |
FY2006 |
FY2007 |
FY2008 |
MIT |
9 |
9 |
7 |
11 |
11 |
10 |
10 |
Harvard |
8 |
8 |
8 |
9 |
7 |
6 |
6 |
*MIT, Harvard, UC Berkeley, UCLA, Connecticut, Princeton, Columbia, USC, Dartmouth, Yale, UMass Amherst, Brown, Michigan, Northwestern, Virginia, UT Austin, Duke, Wisconsin, Penn, Georgia Tech, Purdue. |
|||||||
As mentioned above, the Libraries received funding this year for market adjustments to librarian and non-librarian supervisory staff salaries. In conjunction with colleagues in MIT Compensation, we conducted a comprehensive market review, comparing librarian salaries with peers both on the national and local levels. While the ARL data is useful and we remain mindful of our standing among peer institutions, greater attention was focused this year on local competition, comparing MIT salaries with those institutions facing the similar challenge of the high cost of living in the Boston area. Data from the BACUS group (Boston Area Colleges and Universities Study) demonstrated that MIT librarian salaries are not competitive when compared to the collective average of librarian salaries at Babson, Bentley, BC, BU, Brandeis, Harvard, MIT, Northeastern, Suffolk, Tufts and Wellesley. In fact, 43 of 62 MIT librarians (69%) fell below the average anywhere from 2% to 18%. While significant, it is even more so when considering that the variance is merely from the average salary. MIT librarians, as well as candidates for positions in the MIT Libraries, expect MIT compensation to reflect the world-class institution that it supports.
The challenges that both the national and local salary data highlight have been borne out in recent recruitment and retention experiences, where bonuses are becoming much more common in order to compete with other institutions.
Fortunately, in response to findings in the librarian market analysis, the MIT Compensation Office allocated approximately $129K in FY08 from contingency funds for base budget adjustments to librarian salaries. Using variance from the norm as the primary criteria, these funds were applied in April of 2008 to 40 (65%) librarian staff salaries. Since the available funding did not allow the Libraries to address all Administrative Staff salaries or to address some to the extent appropriate, we will continue to work with Compensation in FY09.
Contingency funds were also made available for a market adjustment to non-librarian supervisor salaries in April. Since BACUS did not have data for this analysis, COMPBASE provided data for comparable positions at 175 companies, colleges and universities in the Northeast. In this case, nine of ten supervisor salaries were below the average by as much as 10%. Similar criteria to the librarian market review were used in applying the allocated $15,500, which affected six of the ten staff.
While not experiencing the same recruitment and retention challenges at the Support Staff level as with the Administrative Staff, it is still important to ensure that all salaries are as consistent as possible with the market. In collaboration with MIT Compensation, a review of the Library Assistant job group was conducted in late fall 2007. BACUS data was particularly relevant in establishing relevant benchmarks. The review revealed the need for adjustments to about 50% of this group, and a total of $59,000 was allocated to Library Assistant salaries in December 2007.
In addition to the special market adjustments and the annual salary reviews, the interim increase pools for both Administrative and Support Staff, made available through the MIT Compensation Office, have been enormously helpful in effective salary administration in the Libraries. These funds have given the Libraries the means to address internal equity, fund salary increases for promotions, offer retention bonuses, etc. In the Administrative Staff category, FY08 funds were used for salary increases resulting from two promotions from the Librarian II to III level and to address four cases of internal equity. For the Support Staff, funds were used for ten off-cycle merit increases and four internal equity adjustments.
MIT’s Compensation Office has been a highly collaborative and supportive partner in managing the Libraries’ salary program to meet the challenges of recruiting and retaining staff. We are grateful for that partnership and the efforts made on our behalf. The Libraries also recognize and gratefully acknowledge the enormous support received from the Provost’s Office and the Corporation’s Salary Subcommittee in these efforts.
In accordance with the librarian/archivist promotion policy, five librarians were promoted in FY08. The Libraries’ promotion policy provides an opportunity for advancement by developing increasing levels of competence and contribution within any given librarian position. Three early-career librarians successfully completed the process of developing a promotion plan based on established criteria and achievement of their development goals which demonstrate initiative, understanding of the Libraries and Institute’s mission, commitment to skill development, and increasing involvement in outside professional activities. In addition, two staff at the Librarian II level were promoted to Librarian III. These librarians demonstrated ongoing professional growth within the context of established criteria around knowledge and experience, commitment to service excellence, leadership ability and outside contributions. The Libraries are fortunate to have professionals of this caliber within the organization, clear leaders in their fields, whose contributions are influencing the mission of both the MIT Libraries and the library profession.
Now in its eighth year, the Libraries’ Infinite Mile Award Program continues to be a valued and meaningful way for staff to recognize the exceptional contributions, achievements, and endeavors of their colleagues. Explicitly designed to promote peer recognition, the program continues to elicit a healthy number of strong nominations - a reflection of the respect and appreciation held for one another in the Libraries. The June 11th award ceremony, in keeping with global events, was creatively designed around the Olympic theme this year and played to a standing-room-only crowd. Of the 33 nominations received, four teams and four individuals were recognized for their contributions in the categories of Innovation and Creativity, Communication and Collaboration, Results, Productivity, and Outcomes, Community, and Unsung Hero. This last category was a new addition this year and received a very positive response. We were also pleased to recognize our new AMPS colleagues this year with a team award given to the Distance Education Acquisition and Delivery group. All Infinite Mile Awardees received a cash award, a certificate, and a gold medal.
The Spot Award Program remains very popular in its seventh year. Participation has not wavered, with a monthly average of 225 thank you notes submitted that express everyday appreciation for a job well done, lending a helping hand, or for the “little things” that support a colleague or collaborative effort. The Libraries’ R&R Committee runs the “Spot Award Road Show”, travelling to a designated library department for a monthly drawing from the pool of thank you notes. Five names were drawn monthly with individuals receiving $100 in gift certificates to a vendor of their choice.
For the third consecutive year, library staff took great pride in celebrating another colleague who was selected to receive the MIT Excellence Award. Theresa Tobin, Humanities Librarian, received an individual award in the category of “Creating Connections: Serving our Communities”, for her development and ongoing stewardship of the "Authors@MIT" series. Begun as a collaborative effort with the MIT Press Bookstore a decade ago, this popular book and author program has contributed immeasurably to the intellectual and social life of the MIT community.
The Libraries held its annual staff reception in January. This event is a time to celebrate the staff of the MIT Libraries, to introduce new employees, and to recognize the 10-, 20-, and 30-year service milestones of the staff. Eleven staff members were recognized this year - six for 10 years, four for 20 years, and one for 30 years of service. It is testament to the dedication and loyalty of the MIT Libraries’ staff to note that since the first group of 30-year service awardees was recognized ten years ago, there have been between one and five staff members in that category every year thereafter.
The Libraries’ Human Resources Administrator and the Human Resources Officer in central HR teamed up in early Spring to provide information to library supervisors on topics such as administering leaves, progressive discipline and performance management. A total of six sessions have been scheduled; three took place between March and June 2008. It is likely that other topics and sessions will be added, because they have been well received and attendance at each session has been between eight and twenty. The sessions provide basic policy information from the central HR perspective as well as local library policy and practice.
Membership in the Boston Library Consortium entitles MIT to three spaces at local training events in addition to online training provided by CAPCON. FY08 training opportunities were plentiful: Social Networking Tools, Workflow Analysis for Technical Processing, Transitioning to Leadership, Communicating Cross-Culturally, and Online Outreach for Libraries, etc. Of the approximately two-dozen offerings, MIT staff attended about half of the sessions with an average attendance of two people per event.
Greg Raposa, the Libraries’ first Facilities and Operations Administrator, left in September 2007 to take a position in the Office of the Provost as the Institute’s Space Administrator. This was an excellent opportunity for him to move to a more senior position serving the entire MIT community, and a great match to his skills. The Libraries discovered the value of this position within weeks of Greg’s arrival in 2002, so a very considerable sense of loss was felt upon his departure. Fortunately for the Libraries, his position was ably filled in December by Michael Smith, formerly a Supervisor in the Grounds Department of MIT Facilities.
Several milestones were reached in FY08 with regard to the future renovation and expansion of Hayden Library (Building 14):
Situating High Density storage adjacent to Hayden would be ideal in terms of operations, but is not affordable due to the need to bury it underground. Alternatively, combining High Density storage with a new Library Storage Annex (LSA) - essentially a warehouse facility at a near-campus location - would gain operational efficiency, lower construction costs, and meet the long-term space needs of MIT’s print collections.
FY08 was the first full year in which AMPS was part of the Libraries’ organization, having moved from the Office of the Provost in January 2007. Among other things, the year was marked by the full incorporation of AMPS into the Libraries’ administrative structure - including fiscal, human resources, and facilities operations. The Associate Directors for Administration and Public Services in the Libraries took joint responsibility for operational management of AMPS, along with the two group leaders within AMPS who report to the Director of Libraries.
AMPS Technology Enhancements
AMPS Projects and New Initiatives
AMPS Infrastructure and Space
AMPS Business Volume
AMPS Human Resources
In addition to its regular operations, Administrative Services expects to focus special attention in FY09 in several areas, including:
Keith Glavash
Associate Director for Administration
webmaster@libraries.mit.edu
This page was last updated on
Thursday, 16-Jul-2009 07:54:40 EDT