|
About Us > Annual
Reports
MIT Libraries
Annual Report FY 2000-2001
Administrative Services
Administrative Services (AS) supports the MIT Libraries mission
and goals in the areas of Budget and Financial, Delivery Services, Facilities/Operations
and Procurement, Payroll and Staff Records, and Personnel. It would not
be an overstatement to say that the services provided by AS are fundamental
to the operation of the Libraries recognizing its role in providing
the infrastructure necessary to support the Libraries Staff in their
provision of services and resources to the users of the Libraries and
their responsibilities to the Institute. The goal of AS is to work behind
the scenes to insure that staff are recruited, hired, retained, remunerated
and provided growth opportunities consistent with MIT policies in well
planned and maintained facilities, at present and in the future.
To integrate the services provided by Administrative Services more directly
into the decision making processing of the Libraries, it was decided at
the beginning of FY01 to create the position of Assistant Director for
Administration who would administer AS and would serve on the Steering
Committee of the Libraries. With the retirement of the Head of Administrative
Services, a review of the role of Administrative Services was undertaken.
It was determined that a department that included all administrative services
would be logical, to this end, the human resources function that had been
split between AS and the Directors Office was integrated as one
area within Administrative Services. It was also determined that the larger
role of facility planning, short and long term, would become a responsibility
of AS (with coordination and collaboration with Public and Collection
Services).
To fill this new position a search was undertaken for a person to serve
as Assistant Director for Administration. The Search Committee conducted
a national search during Summer 2000. The search was successful and an
appointment was made January 1, 2001.
Budget and Financial
A major transition took place during this past year. The retirement of
the AS Department Head after many years of service, along with the resignation
of the Business Services Administrator several months later, could have
seriously hampered the efficiency and effectiveness of AS. However, on
an interim basis, the Associate Director for Collections Services and
a staff accountant on loan from the Controllers Accounting Office
provided able leadership for AS. During the Fall, a successful search
was completed and the vacant Financial Administrator position was filled
effective January 1, 2001.
Concurrent with this appointment came the implementation of the new integrated
on-line library system. Not only does the new system integrate all facets
of accessing research information for the MIT Libraries, it is also the
financial procurement and auditing system for the acquisition of library
resources, both print and digital products. The Financial Administrator
worked closely with colleagues in SAS to insure that all present and historic
records were correctly transferred and that an accurate and efficient
process to procure and pay for library acquisitions is in place.
Delivery Services (DSO)
The work involved in moving materials throughout the MIT Libraries as
well as distributing all mail and other delivery services requires not
only coordination and cooperation of all involved, it requires strong
backs. The amount of library materials moved throughout the Libraries
has been steadily increasing. With the shift of more and more of the Libraries
holdings into storage, either at RSC or the Harvard Depository, the requests
and return of materials from these sites places additional demands upon
DSO services. It can only be expected that as more materials are sent
to storage these demands and expectations will increase.
Many factors come into play as materials are moved throughout the Libraries
not the least of which is renovation of facilities, creating difficulties
in accessing loading docks or delivery sites. Coupled with this is the
disruption caused by street repairs or right of way work, making it difficult
to reach some delivery points. The DSO Staff has been resourceful and
creative in adjusting to these challenges. This Spring, the DSO Staff
began to record the number of materials distributed through its operations.
In future annual reports, it will be possible to compare past and present
use, as well as project demand for Delivery Services in upcoming years.
Facilities and Operations
FY01 saw significant steps taken on several critical facility issues,
including: short term maintenance, building renovation and upgrades, and
a major effort to identify long term facility planning.
During the Summer of 2000, construction of a fire pipeline into Building
14 was begun. Preliminary meetings were held to discuss the various phases
and its impact on operations. Piping was brought through the basement
of Building 14 into two newly cored penetrations to the exterior. This
work affected various units of the Libraries, including Preservation Services,
Document Services, Music Library, and Delivery Services.
Building 14 has long been subject to roof leaks, especially in 14S. After
a particularly bad leak in February, an intensive effort undertaken by
Facilities identified several problems with drainage and cracks in the
roof and floor of the penthouse. Work was completed during Spring to correct
the problems, and at the end of the FY01, the issues seem to have been
resolved.
The Dewey Library Staff identified several safety issues with the basement
of E53, including emergency signs and lighting. This was brought to the
attention of Facilities who installed the necessary signs and lights.
To freshen the appearance of the Dewey Library, new drapes were installed
to replace ones hung when the building was built in the 1960s.
The installation of a series of panels depicting the history of the School
of Humanities, Arts, and Social Sciences (SHASS) caused a major refurbishing
to take place along the corridor in 14N. This was accomplished by collaboration
and coordination between the Libraries and SHASS. The result is a much
brighter and attractive corridor in close proximity to the entrance to
the Humanities and Science Libraries in Hayden.
Aeronautics and Astronautics Library
FY01 saw the completion of the work on the Aero/Astro Library. Begun
during FY00, the complete re-thinking and re-designing of this library
has enabled it to be more fully integrated into the teaching and learning
processes of the departments it serves. Located adjacent to laboratories,
it is easily accessible to students and faculty as their need for information
arises. The space was designed to accommodate print materials, access
to digital resources, study space and staff work areas. Although less
square footage than the older facility, the use of compact shelving and
excellent design has made the space more effective in meeting its mission.
CRSP FY01 Project
In order to house as many print materials as possible within Building
14, it was determined that installation of compact shelving (moveable
shelving that reduces space dedicated to aisles), should be investigated
for the basement of 14. After an engineering study determined that only
a limited portion of the floor had the strength to support compact shelving,
a CRSP proposal was funded in FY01 that provided for the installation
of compact shelving in this section at the center of the basement. While
the capacity was not what had been hoped, the new compact shelving is
expected to extend the shelving capacity for up to five more years. The
project began after the end of classes in May 2001 and is underway during
the summer of 2001. For further discussion of this important project,
especially the impact upon collection shelving and storage, please see
the Annual Report of Collection Services.
A second project was also funded as part of the FY01 CRSP projects, which
is the renovation of Hayden Libraries entrance. This project is expected
to include the integration of the Reserve Book Room into the immediate
area and to provide a 24-hour study room. Due to planning delays and the
review being undertaken by Shepley, Bulfinch, Richardson, and Abbot during
FY01 of Building 14 (see below) that could have impinged on this project
it was decided to delay this project until FY02.
CRSP Proposals FY02
The libraries responded to the call for FY02 CRSP proposals by submitting
two projects. The MIT Libraries had been given an anonymous gift to support
the creation of a Preservation Services Laboratory. The gift was to purchase
the necessary equipment and cover some staff costs. The Preservation Services
Laboratory will eventually become part of an integrated Preservation Services
Center, which will house both the Preservation Services Laboratory as
well as a new digital projects laboratory. Funding is now being sought
for this companion Digital Projects Laboratory. In order to house the
additional equipment and staff necessary for such a Center, the Libraries
had to identify space adjacent to the site of the current Preservation
unit. The concurrent impact required a juggling of space between the original
Preservation unit, the Library Systems Office and the Institute Archives.
In Spring 2001 the Libraries were informed that this project had received
CRSP support. Planning will begin during Summer 2001, with the project
to begin during IAP, January, 2002.
Long Term Facility Planning
During FY01 a major effort was begun to assess the long-term facility
needs of the MIT Libraries. Since the MIT Libraries are housed in facilities
that basically have not changed since the 1960s with the completion of
the Dewey Library, the ability of the Libraries to house collections and
provide services consistent with the needs and expectations of students
and faculty of MIT at the beginning of the 21st century is seriously compromised.
The FY 00 Libraries Master Plan, prepared with the assistance of Shepley
Bulfinch (SBRA) architectural firm, called for combining the Engineering
and Science Libraries into one facility. In FY 01, the Libraries again
contracted with Shepley Bulfinch to assist with a Feasibility Study of
Building 14 to discover its potential for housing a combined engineering
and science library as well as the central services currently housed there.
Their report was received in May, 2001. It concluded "that an expanded
Building 14 would not effectively accommodate the programs for both the
Science and Engineering Library and the Library Central Services".
The report includes the following components: analysis of existing building
conditions, analysis of compliance with building codes, program for a
Science and Engineering Library, program for the Libraries Central
Services, proposed architectural diagram, preliminary phasing and project
cost estimates. Even with the proposed aggressive and expensive expansion
plan, the Building 14 library facilities would fall 20% short of program
needs for a combined Science and Engineering Library and Central Library
Services. However, the feasibility study illuminated a number of opportunities
for improving library facilities in Building 14 and will continue to inform
viable alternatives for functional program accommodation. It has already
been of great use in planning the compact shelving project for the basement
and in providing reliable data for continued space planning.
Payroll & Staff Records
At the invitation of Financial Systems Services, the Staff Administrator
participated in the development and testing of an alternate platform on
the Web for journal voucher preparation. Voucher employees hired for projects
or unfilled positions increased from 12 in 1999/00 to 40 in 2000/01. In
order for Library Council members to track voucher payroll expenditures,
a form was created. To facilitate the links between Human Resources and
the Libraries Payroll, the Staff Administrator assumed responsibility
for correcting errors and/or resolving problems with payroll status.
Personnel
Recuitment
Recruitment and search activities in the MIT Libraries continued to receive
a high level of energy and attention in FY01. The Libraries filled 13
administrative and professional staff positions as a result of serious
searches. In addition to traditional librarian positions, these newly
filled vacancies included a Library Technology Consultant, an Analyst/Programmer,
a GIS and Statistics Specialist, a Financial Administrator, and several
non-librarian supervisor positions. Also included in this total were the
search to fill a Libraries Steering Committee position, Assistant
Director for Administration, and a newly developed position in the Libraries,
that of Director of Development. Two additional administrative staff level
positions were filled through the waiving of the serious search process
and internal promotions of highly qualified support staff (Library Technology
Consultant and Supervisor, Dewey and Humanities Processing) and another
was filled through the upgrade of a support staff position (to Facilities
and Operations Administrator), again creating an opportunity for an internal
promotion.
The Libraries also conducted a record number of serious searches to fill
Sponsored Research Staff positions this year. Grants from Hewlett-Packard
and the Mellon Foundation for the DSpace Project and for the E-Journals
Archiving Project have provided funding to fill several "hot skill"
positions. The Libraries now have four Sponsored Research Staff associated
with these exciting projects, a Project Planner for E-Journals Archiving,
and for the DSpace Project a Systems Curator and two Senior Marketing
Development Managers.
The largest number of positions filled throughout FY01, however, was
among support staff. A total of 32 positions were filled this year, which
represents approximately one-third of the Libraries support staff
headcount. A competitive local job market has clearly taken its toll on
the Libraries ability to attract and retain library assistants.
Salary requirements for many of these incoming library assistants have
created internal equity issues, which will require analysis and attention
over the next year.
The recruitment of student assistants in the Libraries remains a challenge.
There are many other jobs on and off campus that offer better wages and
more meaningful career opportunities for students. In order for many library
departments to carry out routine, basic services, it has become necessary
to hire temporary hourly/casual employees. While this strategy has proven
effective in some cases, it can only be for a limited period of time and
does not allow the Libraries to establish valuable relationships with
the student community.
Retention
The Libraries recorded 26 terminations this year 9 from the administrative
staff and 15 from the support staff. Of the 9 departing administrative
staff members, 2 retired and 2 left the workforce for family reasons.
Exit interviews with other departing staff members show salary still to
be one factor impacting the decision to leave the MIT Libraries. Another
of the factors cited for leaving the Libraries is the perception of a
heavy burden on limited staff. A clear message from several of these departing
staff members was that the Libraries do not have enough staff to accomplish
the innovative things they want to do and still maintain effective patron
services.
The Libraries have seen a significant impact of the special allocation
provided in FY01 for market adjustments to librarian salaries. These salary
increases have been noted by staff as recognition on the part of the Institute
of their value to the teaching and research programs of MIT. These salary
increases have also improved the MIT Libraries competitive position
among our peers.
According to the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) recent
salary survey (reporting 1999-2000 data), MIT ranked 23rd of 122 in Average
Professional Salary. This figure is up from 39th last year. Among our
true peer institutions (22) in this group, the MIT Libraries have risen
in the standings from 16th to 12th. It is worth noting, however, that
seven of the peer institutions out-ranking MIT are located in the northeast.
MIT Ranks 12th Among Peer Group and Below Group Average in Salary
Ranking
|
| |
FY00 Average FY01
|
Average Peer Group
|
Average
|
| |
Professional Salary
|
Professional Salary
|
Professional Salary
|
| UC-Berkeley |
63250
|
68414
|
56213
|
| Stanford |
63727
|
67221
|
56213
|
| UCLA |
63233
|
65174
|
56213
|
| Columbia |
58392
|
60862
|
56213
|
| USC |
57038
|
58511
|
56213
|
| UConn |
56121
|
58468
|
56213
|
| Princeton |
57144
|
58102
|
56213
|
| UMass Amherst |
53417
|
57199
|
56213
|
| Harvard |
55899
|
56732
|
56213
|
| Dartmouth |
54719
|
56541
|
56213
|
| Yale |
53017
|
56488
|
56213
|
| MIT |
50052
|
54846
|
56213
|
| UWisc.-Madison |
47773
|
54367
|
56213
|
| UMichigan |
51543
|
53921
|
56213
|
| Brown |
51916
|
53233
|
56213
|
| UVirginia |
52335
|
52058
|
56213
|
| Northwestern |
50290
|
51915
|
56213
|
| Duke |
49117
|
51384
|
56213
|
| UT-Austin |
49588
|
50888
|
56213
|
| GaTech |
48321
|
50318
|
56213
|
| UPenn |
49243
|
50303
|
56213
|
| Purdue |
48425
|
49751
|
56213
|
MIT has improved its standing in Beginning Professional Salary as well,
up from 37th to 15th within the entire ARL group, and up from 14th to
8th among our true peer group. Again, a number of the peer institutions
outranking MIT are New England institutions, including Harvard.
Statistics support that MITs ranking among its peer institutions,
both for beginning and average professional salaries, has substantially
improved as a result of the Institutes attention to enhancing the
MIT Libraries position in the competitive marketplace. These statistics
also indicate that continued attention to librarian salaries will further
improve MITs competitive edge against other academic library peers
such as Harvard, Princeton, Stanford, and the UC system.
Two of the fifteen support staff departures were due to retirement. While
salary is an issue in attracting new support staff it does not appear
to be a direct factor in support staff departures. A significant number
of last years support staff terminations can be attributed to job
advancement or career pursuit. It is worth noting that five (one-third)
of the 15 positions vacated this year were by employees who had been with
the Libraries for one year or less, however, several of these were attributable
to performance issues.
Administrative Services staff has begun collaborating with the
Compensation Office to analyze market data and assess salaries of both
administrative and support staff in the Libraries. In addition to reviewing
salary data, the Libraries have provided compensation staff with
information regarding recruitment and retention challenges for library
staff in the form of a "Strategic Workforce Planning" document.
Rewards and Recognition
By all accounts the Libraries implementation of the Institutes
Rewards and Recognition initiative was a success. Operating under a significant
time constraint, the Libraries design team developed programs for
both the Infinite Mile Award and the Spot Award during the first half
of the year. On June 27 a luncheon was held for library staff to celebrate
the contributions of all staff members during what has been a very demanding
year. The luncheon was followed by a celebratory and even moving presentation
of the Infinite Mile Awards. Within each of the award categories (Innovation
and Creativity; Communication and Collaboration; Results, Productivity,
and Outcome; and Community), four individuals and four teams a
total of 25 staff members received a certificate of appreciation
and a cash award.
Both programs were explicitly designed around peer-recognition. The impressive
number of persuasive and heart-felt nominations received for the Infinite
Mile Award was truly gratifying and reflected the great respect and appreciation
library staff members have for one another. The Spot Award Program, a
monthly drawing from a pool of submitted "thank yous",
kicked off at the June 27th award event. The program was well received
and thank yous have already begun rolling in.
Affirmative Action
It is discouraging to note the decrease in the Libraries minority
representation among the administrative staff. With the departure of two
Asian females since July 2000, the percentage of underrepresented minorities
on the administrative staff is now at 3%. One of the librarians took a
position at the Harvard Business School and the other elected to devote
more time to her young family. In both cases the MIT Libraries developed
and supported creative strategies to try to retain these individuals,
including sponsorship in the Association of Research Libraries Leadership
and Career Development Program for underrepresented minority librarians
in the former case, and the creation of a job share arrangement in the
latter. Though ultimately unsuccessful, both strategies enabled us to
retain these librarians in our employ for a longer period of time.
Despite diligent recruitment efforts in the serious search process we
have been able to identify only a very few minority applicants in our
candidate pools. This is a trend experienced by academic and research
libraries across the country, as the percentage of minority library school
students remains low. Of that small portion of minority students, few
are electing to pursue librarianship in the academic setting. The highly
competitive job market for librarians in general as well as MITs
need for librarians with sci/tech backgrounds are added complications.
Recruitment for the majority of librarian positions involves a full national
search where positions are posted with various American Library Association
minority groups. Full or limited local searches are conducted to fill
non-librarian, professional positions and a local affirmative action source,
such as The Bay State Banner, is used. Each applicant pool is diligently
reviewed to identify any possible minority applicants, and to interview
those applicants who meet the qualifications. Of the searches conducted
this year, a total of six minority candidates were interviewed.
Minority representation on the support staff is much more encouraging.
Of currently filled positions, 13% are from underrepresented minority
groups.
Training
In order for library staff to keep up in the fast-paced, ever-changing
world of technology, they must be proactive in seeking out and participating
in skill development opportunities. The Libraries, in turn, must provide
an environment that supports and encourages continuous learning.
Responsibility for providing technology training opportunities for library
staff is shared by many groups and individuals in the Libraries outside
of Administrative Services. For non-technology training, many library
staff avail themselves of MITs Office for Organization and Employee
Development offerings, which are convenient and receive good reviews.
Several specific opportunities were organized this year for library staff
members:
In an effort to develop strong presentation skills in our library professionals
(for bibliographic instruction in the classrooms, demonstrations of
library technologies and systems to the MIT community, presentations
to Visiting Committee, donors, etc.) a workshop was scheduled last summer
with a local trainer. Approximately 12 staff members learned how to
present themselves and their material more effectively, through group
exercises, videotaping, and critiquing.
In response to a request from some newer supervisors, a special session
of "Giving Performance Appraisals" was scheduled with MIT
Human Resources. With the many competing priorities in the Libraries
at that time, only 4 supervisors were able to attend. In preparation
for the 2001 support staff performance evaluation cycle, another special
session is planned.
Complaint Handlers Training, led by Prof. J. Samuel Keyser, was
scheduled for 13 staff members in December 2001. It has been the Libraries
goal to provide this training to all supervisors as well as all committee
members of the Libraries Advisory Committee on Workplace Issues.
Participation in professional organizations and conferences is also an
important way for librarian and other professional staff to receive training
and keep up-to-date with current technologies and best practices in the
library profession. The Libraries place a high value on professional development
opportunities and provide financial support for travel, lodging, and registration
fees. Despite the fact that this funding only represents partial funding
of these important development activities, statistics show that the majority
of the Libraries professional staff participates regularly in some
type of funded professional activity. Professional associations include
the American Library Association, Library and Information Technology Association,
American Society of Information Science, Geological Society of America,
and the American Chemical Society.
Procurement
The procurement of library supplies and equipment and the monitoring
of all contracts with vendors are completed by the Facilities and Operations
Administrator. Due to the illness since February 2001of the Facilities
and Operations Administrator, members of the AS staff have shared many
of the duties. The Staff Administrator assumed much of the day-to-day
supervision of facilities, procurement, and parking.
Conclusion
This has been a year of great change for the staff of the Administrative
Services Department. With significant personnel changes, the integration
of other operations within the department, and a new department head,
it has been a challenging time for all involved. However, it has been
an opportunity for the AS staff to pull together and to learn more about
each area within the department.
James Mullins
webmaster@libraries.mit.edu
This page was last updated on
08/09/07
|